Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) – SMARTcare eVerified
Across the Nation. Helping agencies stay EVV compliant, empower caregivers and improve workflow – outstanding care starts with SMARTcare
Electronic Visit Verification
SMARTcare’s EVV platform ensures the right care is delivered and verified. Using SMARTcare’s intelligent EVV and SMARTcare eVerified your agency can optimize your caregiver’s mobile workflow, ensure compliance, track total care and improve outcomes.
SMARTcare’s intelligent EVV tools and SMARTcare eVerified keep patients and caregivers safe from fraud and provide agencies with the leading digital solution for staying compliant and running a successful home care business.
What is EVV?
Learn more about EVV on SMARTcare’s What is EVV page
Accurate | Included | State Compliant | Integrated
SMARTcare’s eVerified – The complete solution customized for your EVV requirements. SMARTcare’s EVV solution offers compliant EVV for all home care providers across the US. Our EVV multi-technologies, including GPS, mobile phone, and telephony, ensure providers get the right solution for them.
- Accuracy Made Simple
- Real-time Mobile
- Multiple Technology EVV Solutions
- Internet Challenged – Offline Verification
- Multilingual
- Voice Verification Security
SMART, simple and secure.
Complete Platform with EVV
As part of our complete home care platform, SMARTcare’s Telephone and GPS Mobile Apps support Medicaid and other payer requirements for completely managing home care agencies’ EVV needs.
Ensuring Accuracy & Compliance
Using multiple technologies SMARTcare ensures EVV accuracy and compliance. Caregivers can easily and quickly clock in/out and capture state specific essential EVV information. SMARTcare’s eVerified engine handles the rest.
Automated Documentation and Transmission
Automatically records the necessary tracking information and directly transmits this to the state or approved aggregator.
Meeting State EVV requirements
State Open EVV
SMARTcare’s eVerified EVV solution is a great fit for home care agencies in states with an Open model State EVV. The SMARTcare advanced EVV technology and platform exceeds the federal EVV requirements today.
State Closed EVV
State assigned specific EVV vendors and aggregator – Let’s talk, we can help!
Some states have chosen to mandate a specific vendor for providing the EVV component for the Medicaid client base. SMARTcare has already built integrations to many of the most widely used EVV State vendors including Sandata, Tellus, HHAeXchange and others. Check out our State by State EVV database to see how SMARTcare works with your state’s Medicaid EVV solution requirement.
SMARTcare eVerified EVV and Mobile App
Built by providers for providers making caregiver visits a snap. SMARTcare Mobile gives everyone the information they need exactly when they need it.
- Multi device platform – Apple iOS and Google Android
- One Touch clock in/out
- EVV and GPS Geofencing
- See & Accept Open Shift requests
- View and modify Schedules
- Cover and reschedule AWAL Shifts
- Get driving directions with maps
- Create and review care notes
- Secure Messaging & Chat (HIPAA compliant)
- Document, review ADLs and Care Plans
- Record care notes, mileage, & expenses
- Track inter-visit travel times, breaks
- See upcoming and historical visits
- Receive/Respond to open visit request
- Caregiver and client signature verification
- Internet challenges, Offline visits
All from the SMARTcare Mobile App with EVV, Now that’s Easy!
Get the EVV solution that’s right for your agency.
Why SMARTcare?
SMARTcare’s eVerified EVV is designed and built to be a fully state-compliant EVV solution. SMARTcare EVV is used across the US by thousands of caregivers every day.
Intuitive, easy to use EVV with caregiver workflow that ensures compliance.
Stay compliant, stay in control and automate workflow
That’s all there is to it – you won’t find an easier and SMARTer EVV software solution than that! SMARTcare offers much more than simple attendance recording.
Alabama
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
Alabama has chosen Authenticare as their aggregator. For more information about specific details regarding Alabama’s EVV requirements follow the link below.
Alaska
EVV Model: Undecided
Alaska has yet to make a decision on the Electronic Visit Verification solution that they will beig utilizing for more information regarding updates on Alaska’s EVV status follow the link below.
Arizona
EVV Model: Open
Target Rollout: October 2019
Arizona plans to implement an open model and has chosen Sandata as its aggregator. Fore more information and updates on the status of Arizona’s EVV follow the link below.
Arkansas
EVV Model: Open | Target Roll-out: October 2019
Arkansas plans to implement an Open model and has chosen Public Consulting Group (PCG) as its EVV aggregator. For more information regarding Arkansas’s EVV status follow the link below.
California
EVV Model: State Mandated In-house System | Target Roll-out: January 2021
For more information regarding California’s EVV status follow the link below.
Colorado
EVV Model: Hybrid Model
Colorado has chosen Sandata as its EVV aggregator for their open model. For more information regarding Colorado’s EVV status follow the link below.
Connecticut
EVV Model: Closed / State Mandated External Vendor
Connecticut has chosen Sandata as its sole aggregator. For more information about complying with Connecticut’s EVV standard follow the link below.
Delaware
EVV Model: Open
Target Rollout: 2020
Delaware is currently working on selecting a state sponsored aggregator but for the time being agencies can continue working with their existing vendors. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Florida
EVV Model: Open
Rollout Began: December 1st, 2018
Florida has chosen Tellus as their aggregator in their open model EVV structure. For more information follow the link below.
Georgia
EVV Model: Open
Georgia will choose a state sponsored aggregator but agencies can continue to use third-party vendors as long as they integrate with the state sponsored solution. For more information follow the link below.
Hawaii
EVV Model: Open
Hawaii has chosen Sandata as their EVV vendor. They are working with Arizona becasue Arizona helps provide the IT infrastructure for Hawaii. For more information follow the link below.
Idaho
EVV Model: Undecided
Target Rollout: July 2020
Idaho has yet to make an official decision on an EVV model. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Illinois
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor | Roll-out: January 2014
Illinois has chosen Santrax as its EVV aggregator. For more information follow the link below.
Indiana
EVV Model: Open
Target Rollout: Janurary 1, 2020
Indiana has chosen Sandata as its state sponsored vendor and requried aggregator. Agencies can use third-party vendors if they meet the requirements of and integrate with Sandata. For more information follow the link below.
Iowa
EVV Model: Undecided
Iowa is currently gathering information and weighing its options and has yet to make a decision. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Kansas
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
Kansas utilizes AuthentiCare as its EVV aggregator. For more information follow the link below.
Kentucky
EVV Model: Undecided
Kentucky is currently evaluating all of their options and has yet to make a decision on an EVV aggregator, they are also in the midst of updating the states IT infrastructure. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Louisiana
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: March 2018
Louisiana has chosen LaSRS as its aggregator for its open model. For more information follow the link below.
Maine
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: July 2021
Maine has chosen Sandata as its EVV aggregator for its open model. For more information follow the link below.
Maryland
EVV Model: State Mandated In-House System
Maryland previously had a phone based EVV system in place and is currently developing a plan for onboarding providers who were not previously utilizing the system. For more information follow the link below.
Massachusetts
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: January 2013
Massachusetts has chosen Optum to assist them in developing a solution. Agencies can continue to use other vendors as long as it integrates with the state standard. For more information follow the link below.
Michigan
EVV Model: Open
Michigan plans to develop a state-run EVV solution and data aggregator. Agencies will be allowed to continue using third-party vendors as long as it integrates with the state solution. For more information follow the link below.
Minnesota
EVV Model: Open
Minnesota is planning on choosing a state-sponsored EVV aggregator while allowing alternative vendors that meet the state requirements. For more information follow the link below.
Mississippi
EVV Model: State Mandated In-House Model | Roll-out: Live
Missippi has already implemented its own EVV solution that is telephone-based called Medikey. For more information about Medikey and its requirements follow the link below.
Missouri
EVV Model: Open
Missouri has been utilizing EVV for several years but some programs where not required to use it. They are in the process of creating a plan and selecting a state-sponsored vendor. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Montana
EVV Model: Undecided
Montana has yet to choose a EVV solution. For more information and updates follow the link below.
Nebraska
EVV Model: Open
Target Rollout: January 1, 2020
Nebraska plans to implement an open model and has chosen Tellus as the aggregator. SMARTcare integrates with Tellus. For more information follow the link below.
Nevada
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
Target Rollout: August 1, 2019
Nevada will require the use of AuthentiCare. For more information and updates follow the link below.
New Hampshire
EVV Model: Undecided
New Hampshire has yet to make an official decision regarding their EVV model. For more information follow the link below.
New Jersey
EVV Model: Undecided
New Jersey is currently examining its options for a solution. For more information and updates follow the link below.
New Mexico
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
New Mexico has chosen AuthentiCare as its aggregator. For more information follow the link below.
New York
EVV Model: Undecided
New York has officially decide the direction they are going with their EVV solution. For more information follow the link below.
North Carolina
EVV Model: Open
North Carolina will choose a state-sponsored solution while still allowing agencies to use alternative solutions that meet the state requirements. For more information follow the link below.
North Dakota
EVV Model: Undecided
North Dakota has gathered information and is in the process of making a final decision on their EVV solution. They have narrowed their choices to Open model, Providers choice, and State Mandated External. For more information follow the link below.
Ohio
EVV Model: Open
Ohio utilizes Sandata as one of its aggregators while still allowing alternatives that integrate and meet standards. For more information follow the link below.
Oklahoma
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
Oklahoma has chosen AuthentiCare as its sole EVV vendor.
Oregon
EVV Model: State Mandated In-House System | Roll-out: July 2019
Oregon has updated its own eXPRS system to gather and report the necessary EVV data. For more information follow the link below.
Pennsylvania
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: January 2020
Pennsylvania has chosen Sandata and DXC to integrate with their current system. For more information follow the link below.
Rhode Island
EVV Model: Open
Rhode Island has chosen Sandata as its state-funded vendor. For more information follow the link below.
South Carolina
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
South Carolina currently uses some EVV services but has yet to announce their plans for meeting the federal requirements.
South Dakota
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
South Dakota has chose Therap as its EVV vendor. If agencies find that the utilization of the states EVV aggregator is not feasible they can request a waiver to be granted persmission to use an alternative solution. For more information follow the link below.
Tennessee
EVV Model: Providers Choice
Tennesee is requiring self-directed providers to utilize PPL for their EVV solution. Anyone who is not self directed has to utilize Sandata. For more information follow the link below.
Texas
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor
For more infomation regarding Texas’s EVV soluton follow the link below.
Utah
EVV Model: Providers Choice
Utah is allowing agencies to partner with any EVV vendor as long as it meets HIPAA and Federal requirements. For more information follow the link below.
Vermont
EVV Model: Open
Vermont has selected Sandata as the state sponsored EVV solution and data aggregator. Agencies can use third-party EVV solutions as long as they integrate with the state system. For more information follow the link below.
Virginia
EVV Model: Provider Choice
Agencies in Virginia may choose their own vendors but must have a solution in place by October 1st. For more information follow the link below.
Washington
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: January 2020
Washington is requiring the use of the state sponsored solution known as ProviderOne. For more information follow the link below.
West Virginia
EVV Model: Open | Roll-out: January 2020
West Virginia has yet to choose a state-sponsored vendor, they will continue to allow agencies to use alternative EVV solutions. For more information follow the link below.
Wisconsin
EVV Model: State Mandated External Vendor | Roll-out: January 2020
Currently Wisconsin has selected Sandata as its state-sponsored vendor and has proposed a closed model but it also looking at utilizing Sandata as the data aggregator while allowing agencies to choose a third-party EVV solution. For more informaiton follow the link below.
Wyoming
EVV Model: Undecided
Wyoming has not yet selected an EVV model or announced any details about the implementation process. For more information follow the link below.
